New H9 2.0T Luxury vs Qin Plus FWD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 24444
OMR 9283
OMR 23520
OMR 8912
OMR 329
OMR 125
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.04 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 0.99
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 0.66
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 6.93
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 4.62
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 30.69
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 20.46
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 361.35
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 240.9
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
185
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5137
4765
1904
1837
1493
1495
3060
2720
/
Flush Door
/
1500
/
17
/
4
/
500
Fuel Economy
17.9
26
62
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
Sensatec Leather
/
Dual
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10.1-inch rotating screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Battery/Charging
/
6.6
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
/
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0T
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
4 cylinders in-line, turbo charged
Plug in Hybrid
241 HP
197 BHP
380
325
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
Motor
/
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
