MG ZS 2023 1.5L STD vs T99 PRE Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 6080
OMR 10394
OMR 5800
OMR 9969
OMR 82
OMR 140
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.2
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.4
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.4
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 9.8
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 36
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 42
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 438
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 511
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4314
4800
1809
1915
1624
1685
2585
2870
448
377
/
1775
/
19 inch
Fuel Economy
17.2
14.1
48
60
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
Electronic Parking
/
245/50 R19
/
245/50 R19
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
112 BHP
224
150
340
/
Turbocharge
/
165
/
95
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
