HS 2.0T Comfort vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
OMR 8616
OMR 26068
OMR 8279
OMR 25036
OMR 116
OMR 351
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.32
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.82
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 9.24
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 12.71
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 40.92
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 56.27
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 481.8
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 662.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4574 mm
5115 mm
1876 mm
1980 mm
1685 mm
1920 mm
2720 mm
2890 mm
463 L
1004 L
/
5 Doors
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
12.2 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
55 L
110 L
12.2 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
Smart Entry
/
✔
/
✔
Interior
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
Electric
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
Standard
/
✔
Safety
✓
/
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Infotainment
/
9
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
Android LCD
/
✔
/
6
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
LED
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Engine
2.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
231 BHP
271 BHP
360 Nm
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
