Explorer 2025 Active 200A vs Nissan Kicks 2023 1.6 S Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Price Comparison
OMR 17076
OMR 6680
OMR 16380
OMR 6400
OMR 230
OMR 90
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.32
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 0.99
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 9.24
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 6.93
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 40.92
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 30.69
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 481.8
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 361.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
180
4
4
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
18
/
5049
4295
2004
1960
1775
1590
3025
2620
515
432
Fuel Economy
12.7
15.4
67
41
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
13.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
10 Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
255/65 R18
/
255/65 R18
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.3
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
2.3L EcoBoost L4
/
300 BHP
118 BHP
420
149
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
