CX-30 High (Terracotta) 2025 vs RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Price Comparison
OMR 13002
OMR 12327
OMR 12506
OMR 11831
OMR 175
OMR 166
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 0.99
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.16
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 6.93
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.09
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 29.7
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 34.65
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 361.35
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 421.58
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
192
200 km/h
4
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4395
4570 mm
1795
1845 mm
1562
1660 mm
2655
2660 mm
430
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
16.7
14.9 Km/L
51
55 L
/
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
11
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
155 BHP
203 BHP
200
243 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
