212 Adventure vs Tucson Comfort 1.6L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
- Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
- Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies
Negative
- Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
- Engine response and noise at high speeds
- Storage space is limited as much as
Price Comparison
OMR 13069
OMR 9585
OMR 12544
OMR 9222
OMR 176
OMR 129
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.82
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.49
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 12.71
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 10.4
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 56.27
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 46.04
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 662.48
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 542.03
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1596 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
2150
/
4705
4500 mm
1895
1865 mm
1936
1650 mm
2860
2680 mm
1598
/
1598
/
235
210 m
40
/
36
/
23.6
/
/
4 Doors
/
620 L
Fuel Economy
9.1
11 Km/L
80
54 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Engine
2.0
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
248 BHP
177 BHP
410
264 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
