RX9 LUX 4WD vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 14181
OMR 14710
OMR 13601
OMR 14148
OMR 191
OMR 198
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.4
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 2
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 9.8
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 14
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 42
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 60
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 511
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 730
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
21
/
4983
4760 mm
1967
1930 mm
1786
1927 mm
2915
2750 mm
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
14.8
10 Km/L
70
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
3
/
✓
/
255/45 R21
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
12.3
12
9
Bose
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
9-Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
MacPhersan
/
Multi-link
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
255/45 R21
/
255/45 R21
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
235 BHP
224 BHP
350
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
