Prado ADV-1 DSL vs Defender 90 SE (P300) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong performance in rough terrain
- Reliability and durability
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High maintenance and repair costs
- Traditional interior design
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 25474
OMR 25920
OMR 24466
OMR 24900
OMR 343
OMR 349
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 0.91
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.65
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 6.37
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 11.55
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 28.21
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 51.15
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 332.15
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 602.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
191 km/h
/
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
18
/
5025
4583 mm
1980
2008 mm
1992
1969 mm
/
5 Doors
/
2587 mm
/
397 L
Fuel Economy
14.1
10 Km/L
110
88 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Doors
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Synthethic Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
Safety
Front Airbags Driver & Passenger + D&P Knee + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
Central And Rear
/
8-Speed Automatic Transmission
/
Chassis & Steering
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/70 R18
/
265/70 R18
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.8
2.0 L
Diesel
Gasoline
201
300 BHP
500
400 Nm
/
V
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
