Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
OMR 16640
OMR 26068
OMR 15999
OMR 25036
OMR 224
OMR 351
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 2.2
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 2.2
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 15.4
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 15.4
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 66
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 66
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 803
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 803
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
210 km/h
6
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5100
5115 mm
1994
1980 mm
1756
1920 mm
3010
2890 mm
566
1004 L
/
5 Doors
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
9.1
9.4 Km/L
/
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.3 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
345 BHP
271 BHP
500
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
