Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT vs Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
OMR 14485
OMR 15292
OMR 13925
OMR 14657
OMR 195
OMR 206
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.04
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.04
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 7.28
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 7.28
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 31.2
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 31.2
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 379.6
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 379.6
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
Dimensions
3
3
2355
2360
16
16
5915
5915
1950
1950
2280
2280
3860
3860
3500
3500
6.4m
6.4m
3180 - 1760 - 1605
3180 - 1760 - 1605
9.3m³
9.3m³
1145
1140
Fuel Economy
13.0 Km/L
12.6 Km/L
70
70
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
4.2
4.2
✓
✓
Driver Seat
Driver Seat
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
Driver & Front Passenger
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
8
8
✓
✓
✓
✓
2
2
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Drive
Macpherson Strut
Macpherson Strut
Leaf spring rigid
Leaf spring rigid
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
✓
Drum
Drum
215/70R16C
215/70R16C
215/70R16C
215/70R16C
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
2.8
2.8
Diesel
Diesel
174
174
420
450
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
