Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT vs Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
OMR 15292
OMR 15292
OMR 14657
OMR 14657
OMR 206
OMR 206
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.04
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.04
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 7.28
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 7.28
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 31.2
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 31.2
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 379.6
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 379.6
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Van
/
Engine / Motor
4
/
Dimensions
3
/
2360
/
16
/
5915
/
1950
/
2280
/
3860
/
3500
/
6.4m
/
3180 - 1760 - 1605
/
9.3m³
/
1140
/
Fuel Economy
12.6 Km/L
/
70
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
/
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.8
/
Diesel
/
174
/
450
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
