Expedition Active 4X2 2025 vs Defender 90 SE (P300) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 22882
OMR 25920
OMR 22010
OMR 24900
OMR 308
OMR 349
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.65
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.65
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 11.55
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 11.55
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 51.15
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 51.15
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 602.25
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 602.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
191 km/h
6
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
8
5 Seater
5636
4583 mm
2029
2008 mm
1941
1969 mm
3343
2587 mm
592
397 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
10.3
10 Km/L
107
88 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Dual Stage front airbags, frontseat side impact airbags,Safety Canopy (includes thirdrow)
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
265/70 R18
/
265/70 R18
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
400
300 BHP
650
400 Nm
/
V
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
