Dodge Charger 2024 3.6L GT vs K3 1.6L MPi Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 12920
OMR 7504
OMR 12400
OMR 7220
OMR 174
OMR 101
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 2.2
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.8
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 15.4
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 12.6
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 66
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 54
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 803
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 657
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
200 km/h
6
4
/
1597 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5040
4545 mm
1905
1765 mm
1479
1475 mm
3052
2670 mm
455
544 L
/
4 Doors
/
160 m
Fuel Economy
9.3
11 Km/L
70
45 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
Driver Seat
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
10.25
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
3.6 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
300 BHP
121 BHP
358
150 Nm
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
