CT5 V 2025 vs Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Price Comparison
OMR 29343
OMR 12920
OMR 28212
OMR 12400
OMR 395
OMR 174
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.13 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 2.15
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.82
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 15.02
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 12.71
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 66.5
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 56.27
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 782.93
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 662.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
210
6
6
2998 cc
/
American
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4922
5040
2039
1905
1452
1479
2946
3052
336 L
455
102
/
Fuel Economy
8 Km/L
9.3
64 L
70
8 Km/L
/
Comfort
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
Smart Entry
/
✔
/
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✔
Driver Seat
✔
/
✔
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
Electric
/
✔
/
✔
✓
Bucket
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10
/
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
✓
Android LCD
/
✔
/
15
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
10 Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
✓
LED
/
✔
/
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
/
3.0
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
360 BHP
300 BHP
550 Nm
358
Technologies
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
