CarteaCompare CarsTiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Price Comparison

TBD

OMR 5200

TBD

OMR 4999

TBD

OMR 70

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0 L/KM

0.06 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

/

Daily Fule Payment

OMR 1.2

Weekly Fule Payment

/

Weekly Fule Payment

OMR 8.4

Monthly Fule Payment

/

Monthly Fule Payment

OMR 36

Yearly Fule Payment

/

Yearly Fule Payment

OMR 438

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

/

8.0

/

Engine / Motor

4

3

/

185

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

17

/

4200

4.314

1760

1.809

1570

1.624

2555

2.585

341

448

Fuel Economy

/

17.2

/

48

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

/

CVT

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Wheel Drive

/

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

1.3 L

Gasoline

Petrol

109 BHP

160 BHP

140

230

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Chery | Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort

VS

MG | MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

Chery | Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort

VS

Renault | Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

Chery | Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort

VS

Renault | All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT

Chery | Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2)

Chery | Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort

VS

BAIC | BAIC X35 2023 1.5L Elite

Chery Related Car

MG Related Car