Subaru Forester 2017 Subaru Forester 2017 2.5i vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
TBD
OMR 5200
TBD
OMR 4999
TBD
OMR 70
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 2.2
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.2
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 15.4
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.4
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 66
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 36
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 803
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 438
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
11.5
8.0
✓
✓
Engine / Motor
180
185
4
3
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4.595
4.314
1.796
1.809
1.686
1.624
2.640
2.585
974
448
Fuel Economy
9.5
17.2
60
48
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
CVT
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.3 L
Petrol
Petrol
170 BHP
160 BHP
235
230
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
