MG RX5 2024 1.5T STD vs 2008 GT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
OMR 8387
OMR 10398
OMR 8031
OMR 9990
OMR 113
OMR 140
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.4
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.2
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 9.8
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.4
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 43.4
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 37.2
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 511
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 438
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
/
4
3
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4571
4300
1855
1987
1719
1550
2708
/
430
545
/
17
Fuel Economy
14.7
16.8
55
44
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
❌
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
10
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.2
Gasoline
Gasoline
171 BHP
130
275
230
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
