ET9 100kwh vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
TBD
OMR 5200
TBD
OMR 4999
TBD
OMR 70
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.2
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.4
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 36
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 438
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
185
/
3
Dimensions
4
5 Seater
5325
4.314
2017
1.809
1621
1.624
3250
2.585
/
448
Fuel Economy
/
17.2
/
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front & Back Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
35
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
CVT
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
255/45 R22
/
255/45 R22
/
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Petrol
707 BHP
160 BHP
/
1.3 L
/
230
Motor
700
/
✓
/
2
/
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
