ES5 2025 425 Pro vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
TBD
OMR 5200
TBD
OMR 4999
TBD
OMR 70
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.2
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.4
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 36
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 438
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
185
/
3
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1615
/
4476
4.314
1849
1.809
1621
1.624
2050
/
462-1423
448
4.99
/
/
2.585
Fuel Economy
/
17.2
/
48
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Key
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
✓
✓
/
4
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
0.43h
/
8.5h
/
Transmission
DHT
CVT
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson Strut
/
Multi-link Independent Suspension
/
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
225/55 R17
/
225/55 R17
/
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
1.3 L
Electric
Petrol
170 BHP
160 BHP
✓
/
/
230
Motor
250
/
1
/
6.6kW
/
Lithium Iron Phosphate
/
Permanent-magnet Synchronous Motor
/
Rear
/
Technologies
Rear
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Sport, Snow, Individual, Comfort, ECO
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
