CarteaCompare CarsSuzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Price Comparison

TBD

OMR 5200

TBD

OMR 4999

TBD

OMR 70

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.07 L/KM

0.06 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

OMR 1.4

Daily Fule Payment

OMR 1.2

Weekly Fule Payment

OMR 9.8

Weekly Fule Payment

OMR 8.4

Monthly Fule Payment

OMR 42

Monthly Fule Payment

OMR 36

Yearly Fule Payment

OMR 511

Yearly Fule Payment

OMR 438

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

/

8.0

/

Engine / Motor

180

185

4

3

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4150

4.314

1755

1.809

1605

1.624

2500

2.585

253

448

Fuel Economy

13.9

17.2

42

48

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

CVT

CVT

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

/

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.3 L

Gasoline

Petrol

150 BHP

160 BHP

190

230

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Suzuki | Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor

VS

MG | MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

Suzuki | Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor

VS

Renault | Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

Suzuki | Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor

VS

Renault | All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT

Suzuki | Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2)

Suzuki | Suzuki SX4 2016 Outdoor

VS

BAIC | BAIC X35 2023 1.5L Elite

Suzuki Related Car

MG Related Car