CarteaCompare CarsGrand Cherokee 4xe vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

Grand Cherokee 4xe vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Price Comparison

TBD

OMR 5200

TBD

OMR 4999

TBD

OMR 70

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.09 L/KM

0.06 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

OMR 1.8

Daily Fule Payment

OMR 1.2

Weekly Fule Payment

OMR 12.6

Weekly Fule Payment

OMR 8.4

Monthly Fule Payment

OMR 54

Monthly Fule Payment

OMR 36

Yearly Fule Payment

OMR 657

Yearly Fule Payment

OMR 438

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

/

8.0

/

Engine / Motor

/

185

/

3

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

4906

4.314

1979

1.809

1812

1.624

2964

2.585

/

448

Fuel Economy

10.7

17.2

72

48

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

CVT

/

Chassis & Steering

/

/

/

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

265/50 R20

/

265/50 R20

/

/

/

Engine

2.0

1.3 L

Hybrid

Petrol

268 BHP

160 BHP

/

230

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Jeep | Grand Cherokee 4xe

VS

MG | MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

Jeep | Grand Cherokee 4xe

VS

Renault | Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

Jeep | Grand Cherokee 4xe

VS

Renault | All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT

Jeep | Grand Cherokee 4xe

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2)

Jeep | Grand Cherokee 4xe

VS

BAIC | BAIC X35 2023 1.5L Elite

Jeep Related Car

MG Related Car