Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
OMR 5041
OMR 5200
OMR 4804
OMR 4999
OMR 68
OMR 70
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.2
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.2
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.4
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 8.4
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 36
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 36
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 438
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 438
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
161 km/h
185
/
3
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
16
/
4341 mm
4.314
1804 mm
1.809
1693 mm
1.624
2676 mm
2.585
414 L
448
Fuel Economy
17.2 Km/L
17.2
50 L
48
17.2 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Driver Seat
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Front Driver And Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
1.3 L
Gasoline
Petrol
115 BHP
160 BHP
156 Nm
230
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
