CarteaCompare Cars900 1.5T Ultra vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

900 1.5T Ultra vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Price Comparison

TBD

OMR 5200

TBD

OMR 4999

TBD

OMR 70

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0 L/KM

0.06 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

/

Daily Fule Payment

OMR 1.2

Weekly Fule Payment

/

Weekly Fule Payment

OMR 8.4

Monthly Fule Payment

/

Monthly Fule Payment

OMR 36

Yearly Fule Payment

/

Yearly Fule Payment

OMR 438

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

4.8

8.0

/

Engine / Motor

230

185

4

3

Dimensions

6

5 Seater

5240

4.314

1999

1.809

1810

1.624

3160

2.585

/

448

Fuel Economy

/

17.2

/

48

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

DHT

CVT

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

/

/

Wheels/brakes

275/45 R21

/

275/45 R21

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5

1.3 L

Gasoline

Petrol

530 BHP

160 BHP

1038

230

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Lynk & Co | 900 1.5T Ultra

VS

MG | MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

Lynk & Co | 900 1.5T Ultra

VS

Renault | Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

Lynk & Co | 900 1.5T Ultra

VS

Renault | All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT

Lynk & Co | 900 1.5T Ultra

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2)

Lynk & Co | 900 1.5T Ultra

VS

BAIC | BAIC X35 2023 1.5L Elite

Lynk & Co Related Car

MG Related Car