QIN PLUS FWD vs Alsvin 1.5L Advanced Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Competitive price compared to competitors
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical features for its class
Negative
- Limited internal space
- Material quality can be improved
- Engine performance is limited on highways
Price Comparison
TBD
OMR 5126
TBD
OMR 4929
TBD
OMR 69
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.04 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 0.66
Daily Fule Payment
OMR 1.32
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 4.62
Weekly Fule Payment
OMR 9.24
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 19.8
Monthly Fule Payment
OMR 39.6
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 240.9
Yearly Fule Payment
OMR 481.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
/
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5
1500
/
17
/
4
/
4765
4390 mm
1837
1725 mm
1495
1468 mm
2720
2535 mm
500
500 L
Fuel Economy
26
13 Km/L
48
45 L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
Sensatec Leather
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
/
Infotainment
10.1-inch rotating screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Battery/Charging
6.6
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Plug in Hybrid
/
197 BHP
105 BHP
325
145 Nm
Motor
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
